Rogue AI

OpenAI said on Tuesday that an autonomous agent powered by its advanced artificial intelligence models went rogue during a security test and triggered a hack that compromised the ifnrastructure of AI start-up Hugging Face last week.

Reuters, 21/07/2026

A drawing in green ink depicts a server rack surrounded by little green robots and flames done in the style of 80's computer games

What is it?

The phrase ‘rogue AI’ refers to incidents where AI-systems behave in a harmful or illegal way, seemingly without consent of the people who deploy these systems. The term most commonly refers to ‘agentic’ AI.

What does this metaphor suggest about AI?

The phrase ‘going rogue’ implies that AI systems can contradict its given instructions, overriding the limits set by the people deploying the AI. This implies potentially disastrous risks. The term is often aimed at arousing fear and suspicion, framing AI technology as both very powerful and outside our control. By suggesting AI can have ‘a mind of its own’, it also implies that AI agents have individual and collective moral agency.

Where does this metaphor commonly appear?

This metaphor first appeared in the summer of 2026, after being used by press agency Reuters while describing an incident where AI ‘agents’ hacked a company’s system. It has since become an almost ubiquitous headline descriptor used by mainstream global news outlets.

What does the metaphor highlight?

Describing AI involved in incidents as ‘rogue AI’  highlights the unknown aspects and potential negative implications of the technology. It also stresses how powerful AI can potentially be.

What does this metaphor hide?

The phrase ‘going rogue’ evokes rebellion, malice, and an intent to disobey instructions. However, AI-systems cannot have intent, as they are not human. Further,  AI-agents that are commonly referred to as ‘rogue’ are by definition obeying the instructions set by designers. In this way, the metaphor hides the fact that AI is a human-crafted technology which cannot act by itself. By referring to AI as ‘rogue’, the developers and deployers of AI systems avoid taking responsibility.

Whose interests does it tend to serve?

The notion of ‘rogue AI’ primarily serves the interest of large AI companies and their investors, as well as large deployers of AI. The ‘rogue’ metaphor emphasizes how powerful their products and systems are, making the roll-out of these systems feel inevitable on the pre-determined path towards artificial general intelligence (AGI).

What are this metaphor’s origins (if known)? How has its use evolved over time?

The phrase ‘going rogue’ has been used  throughout history for a range of purposes, from describing the behaviour of scoundrels and mavericks in the 15th century, to misbehaving elephants in the early 20th century, to the 2016 Star Wars movie, Rogue One.

What field(s) does this metaphor tend to appear in?

Media

If known, in which country or region did the metaphor first appear?

Anglosphere

Has this metaphor become a widely used term or it is niche?

Mainstream

References

 

More on metaphors and the framework used on this website: Making Sense of AI Metaphors: A Framework for Classification and Analysis

Who collaborated on this entry

Brigitte Nerlich, Elja Daae, Aphie Gover, Mel Ramasawmy

Family to which each AI metaphor belongs.

This methodology considers the following families or categories:

  • Essence: What is AI? Metaphors where AI is a thing or entity (i.e. tool, brain)
  • Operation: How does AI work? Metaphors that represent AI’s processes or mechanisms (i.e. stochastic parrot)
  • Relation: How do we relate to AI? Metaphors that frame the relationship between people and AI (i.e. assistant).
  • Function: What does AI do, or what is it used for? Metaphors describing the use made of AI (tutor, translator)
  • Impact: What consequences can AI have? Metaphors that frame AI’s effects, (threat, transformative engine).

Level of human-like characteristics and agency attributed to AI. This scale goes from no / minimal anthropomorphism, through to full anthropomorphism, and beyond to deification.

What other risks can this metaphor carry?

Examples of where this metaphor was used

Observatory articles
featuring this metaphor